AIDS Vaccine Revisionism
Trust the SCIENCE!
I just had to share this juicy tidbit I came across recently:
This was from way back in 1994, when scientists still seemed to have some semblance of intellectual honesty left.
The article discusses the terrible results from a test of a gp120 subunit vaccine for HIV where 5 test subjects got infected after vaccination, and in one case, the vaccine may have even “accelerated the progression of the disease”. The scientists quoted in the article express serious concern over this outcome, with Dr. Graham stating that “these five people are going to be studied with more intensity than anybody else has ever been studied”. Haha. I’m sure that he really meant it at the time, but do you think there was ever any follow-up on this? Yeah, right. Instead, we get this dribble in a 2018 Nature article:
The human studies showed that gp120- or gp160-based vaccines could elicit HIV-specific cellular and humoral responses in vaccinated individuals, but the protection rates reported were low.
And did you ever figure out why the protection rates were “low” or in fact possibly negative…?
**crickets**
As if any of us needed any reminder - science is no longer about truth but rather the almighty dollar.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars
And do you want to bet the current jabs have this as a component? I would not take that bet. These hell shots have been worked upon for a very loooong time. They knew, they know, they do. Your job is to evade as best you can, and exercise your right to decline to contract with the devil.